nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees apply.
In case the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according into the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Also, it may well review an appeal of a decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts In the event the Commission cannot access a decision.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, because the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, fairly he has been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it's properly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted within the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case from the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Many of the volumes (like more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are accessible online through the Caselaw Access Project.
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outdoors traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and proficiently.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it truly is effortless for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's arrived at to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got reached such stage. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is usually a perfectly-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Summaries offer an essential glimpse into the click here intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and insurance policies geared toward safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may perhaps seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more